BELOW ARE some of the views being posted around the web on Amnesty International’s decision on abortion. More will follow. Also see Consistent Life’s page for more links. It might be worth pointing out that the quotes here come from a variety of sources: Pro-Life sources, Christian sources, Muslim blogs, and blogs with no links to any religious or pro-life group. Amnesty International’s position is made clear in the documents it tried to cover up in April.

“Violence cannot be answered with further violence; murder with murder; for even if the child is unborn, it is still a human person. It has a right to dignity as a human being.” Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone as reported by Spero News

“If Amnesty International becomes an organisation which affirms the right to abortion, even under certain circumstances, it is free democratically to do so. But it cannot expect those of us who are just as passionate about the human rights of the unborn child to feel at ease being part of such an organisation.” – Rt Rev Michael Evans as reported in the Times of London

“By its actions Amnesty International has shown that in today’s world what determines a “human right” is based on ideology rather than human dignity.” – John Mallon, Human Life International

“It is a tragedy that AI has adopted abortion as a human right. It has now placed in jeopardy the wonderful work that it has performed.” Right to Life, New Zealand

“I think it sad that Amnesty should get involved with something that simply isn’t in its remit; it will inevitably compromise the good work it does.” Nova et Vetera blog

“To claim the right to abortion and to recognize that right in law, means to attribute to human freedom a perverse and evil significance: that of an absolute power over others and against others. This is the death of true freedom.” – Paul Kokoski, Caribbean Net News


Amnesty International, the world’s largest human rights organization, definitively threw away its last chance to rescind its recent abortion advocacy policy at the International Council meeting in Mexico City last weekend. – Elizabeth O’Brien, Lifesite

“Don’t let the media fool you – opposition and outrage to AI’s sharp break with its history on this issue is not limited to the “Church” or “Christians”” – Marjorie Campbell, Deal W. Hudson blog

“Amnesty offers no comment on the murder of innocent pre-born babies in light of their right to continue living. I’m not overlooking the terrible act of rape which does sometimes result in pregnancy. I’m recognizing the inescapable fact that abortion is the murder of an innocent to punish the sin of someone else entirely or to try and escape the natural consequence of one’s own sin.” – Marklaroi, Pieces of a Whole blog


“I support the work you do, but I can not support you if you support abortion, a betrayal of human rights, as a human right.” – John-Paul C. Deddens, Students for Life of Illinois

“The Jesuit headmaster of Sydney’s St Aloysius’ College has confirmed that his school will sever its ties with Amnesty International.” CathNews

“We can work with groups and people with whom we do not agree with on every issue on common interests,” Mr. [Stephen] Colecchi [director of the Office of International Peace and Justice at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops] said. “But it’s a different moral issue for people of conscience to contribute directly to an organization whose work now will include the decriminalization of abortion.” – The Washington Times

“Amnesty International was founded to protect human rights, yet it now treads upon the most fundamental human right, the right to life.” – Fr Frank Pavone, Priests for Life

“Amnesty has ignored the views of its own membership and the very aims for which it was constituted. It has treated the views of church-goes (its best supporters) with contempt. Pro-lifers will now be looking very seriously at initiating an immediate and complete boycott of Amnesty.”LifeLeague

“It’s not only Catholics therefore, but those of all faiths and none, who are in favour of the human rights of all, especially the most vulnerable in our society, who will now boycott this organisation and divert their time, money and resources to other causes. “– Damian Rhodes, South Wales Echo

“..it seems like another example of an organisation succumbing to “mission creep”, involving itself in matters which have nothing to do with the reason it was set up…..Surely there are already enough people fighting for women’s abortion “rights”; for Amnesty International to take this on as a side issue hardly helps that cause but hurts its own, because of the inevitable falling-off of funding. It is a mistake.Indigo Jo blog

“The point I am making is about Amnesty International, an organization that uses its credibility to intervene in political processes and discussions. That credibility has long ago been squandered.” – Helen Szamuely, Eureferendum blog

“What do you call an organisation that consults its members on a contentious policy change but ignores the result, censors dissidents, adopts the policy in secret, claims without any verification that the policy has been “overwhelmingly adopted by the global membership through our democratic structures” and then launches a vicious smear campaign against conscientious objectors by accusing them of undermining its “good work”? It calls itself a human-rights organisation. This blog calls it what it is: a fraud.” – Red Maria, Dolphinarium Blog

Advertisements